 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Kernel with Xen and perormance?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Kernel with Xen and perormance? |
| From: | Jean-Eric Cuendet <jec@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 07 Jan 2006 21:22:55 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:29:16 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) |
Hi,What is the difference between a kernel with Xen but not used (Dom0 node) and a kernel without Xen code at all? For distrib, it could be very important that we have a standard kernel *with* Xen even if 95% of users don't use it (if the perf impact is null or low) so the 5% of the user that need/want Xen can use it out of the box without recompiling. So, is there a perf penalty if Xen is in the kernel? Thanks -jec _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] xen usage monitoring (munin plugin), Goetz Bock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Re: booting LVM, Matthew Palmer |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] xen usage monitoring (munin plugin), Goetz Bock |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Kernel with Xen and perormance?, Fraser Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
