WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: Using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U was [Xen-users] Poorhard d

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U was [Xen-users] Poorhard disk performance on xen-3/dom0
From: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:23:12 +0530
Cc: ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David H <davidh.davidh@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:58:14 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=klO3qDDcKEXPY8BgY7rqa9s2sQGF/bfl1uEZ+ECW8wlQ1FJlqlknfnPjdFtzxVgC9N3P1dq3oRnuW01cMz/ytRUc2gkXRQw1BV6CU/MtRD3uGTqXYvXy9NsB7TspOvPONecbhZm2nuOeXpIJwZbW5JfsQZbG51x6mPTGXquX56g=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D409F1B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D409F1B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the information. I will try the unstable out. However will still love to see it out in stable version.

On 1/1/06, Ian Pratt < m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for the reply Ian. Fernando on this list told me about
> the vifname parameter being excluded from xen 3.0 (doesn't
> work either when i try to use it inside the config) and was
> reincluded in unstable, any ideas when it would make it to
> the stable /rpm.

There's a few things we want to get into to -unstable before we roll
3.0.1, such as the xen subarch changes and 2.6.14. Maybe 2-4 weeks.

With all the regression testing, the -unstable tree is usually stable
(unless you're unlucky and get a bad changeset), so plenty of people do
use it in production.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>