WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] xen-unstable amd64 troubles

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] xen-unstable amd64 troubles
From: Thomas Schneider <etomsch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:37:10 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:37:21 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

please excuse my late reply, but I had a lot of work to do last night. I tried the latest changeset again this morning, but got the same problems again.

xm info
system                 : Linux
host                   : atbroy64
release                : 2.6.12.6-xen0-br14
version                : #2 Fri Nov 11 08:34:18 GMT 2005
machine                : x86_64
nr_cpus                : 1
nr_nodes               : 1
sockets_per_node       : 1
cores_per_socket       : 1
threads_per_core       : 1
cpu_mhz                : 2002
hw_caps                : 078bfbff:e1d3fbff:00000000:00000010
memory                 : 1534
free_memory            : 224
xen_major              : 3
xen_minor              : 0
xen_extra              : -devel
xen_caps               : xen-3.0-x86_64
xen_params             : virt_start=0xffff800000000000
xen_changeset          : Thu Nov 10 18:43:56 2005 +0100 7745:b9e8654c3f10
cc_compiler            : gcc version 3.4.4 (Gentoo 3.4.4-r1)
cc_compile_by          : root
cc_compile_date        : Fri Nov 11 08:41:18 GMT 2005

I customized the kernel to accomplish my hardware needs.
The machine got 1500MB of mem, Dom0 got 512 from these, the other 3 DomUs got 256.

I'm almost sure, that my kernel-config is right for my machine.

Thanks in advance,

Thomas

--On 10. November 2005 16:49:03 +0000 Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Please can you try figuring out how to repro.

Also, in bug reports please aditionally state:
 * your changeset number (please always make sure you're using the
latest)
 * whether you have modified the kernel config in any way
 * how much memory your machine has, how much each of the domains have

I think this issue may already be on bugzilla. Would like to get it
nailed, but we need more info to repro.

Thanks,
Ian


I'm using xen-unstable with all the latest changesets and
some domains on it on a amd64 machine.
Today my domains crashed with the following output:

Unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88000e928700 RIP:
<ffffffff803988ca>{netif_poll+1354}
PGD 788067 PUD 789067 PMD 7fe067 PTE 0
Oops: 0002 [1]
CPU 0
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.12.6-xenU-br14
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff803988ca>] <ffffffff803988ca>{netif_poll+1354}
RSP: e02b:ffffffff806d3d98  EFLAGS: 00010212
RAX: ffff88000e928700 RBX: ffff88000e909940 RCX: ffff88000e928058
RDX: ffff88000e928700 RSI: ffff88000e9091c0 RDI: ffff88000e909940
RBP: ffff88000e909940 R08: 0000000000feffff R09: 0000000000000017
R10: ffff88000f312250 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8800016d4360
R13: ffff88000167c550 R14: 00000000000000c0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  0000000000505ae0(0000) GS:ffffffff806c0080(0000)
knlGS:ffffffff80600400
CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffffffff806d2000, task
ffffffff8057d500)
Stack: 0000000180117076 0000000200000040 0000000000000002
001e7cab001e7cab
       ffffffff806d3e2c ffff8800016d4000 ffffffff806d3dc8
ffffffff806d3dc8
       ffff880000000000 ffff8800016d4000 Call
Trace:<ffffffff803ea348>{net_rx_action+152}
<ffffffff801325ab>{__do_softirq+107}
       <ffffffff8013264d>{do_softirq+61} <ffffffff80114ea9>{do_IRQ+57}
       <ffffffff8010d948>{evtchn_do_upcall+136}
<ffffffff80112029>{do_hypervisor_callback+17}
       <ffffffff8010fa53>{xen_idle+83} <ffffffff8010fa53>{xen_idle+83}
       <ffffffff8010fa8f>{cpu_idle+31}
<ffffffff806d46ea>{start_kernel+490}
       <ffffffff806d4169>{_sinittext+361}

Code: c7 00 01 00 00 00 48 8b 83 10 01 00 00 c7 40 04 00 00
00 00 RIP <ffffffff803988ca>{netif_poll+1354} RSP <ffffffff806d3d98>
CR2: ffff88000e928700
 <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!

xm dmesg tells me:

(XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type 'CTRL-a' three times to
switch input to Xen).
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=4f27e001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=3f7df001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=3f03b001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=516ca001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=4f306001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=50cf0001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=52305001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=510ce001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=3efc1001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=3efc2001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=3efc3001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=4e74c001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=4e74d001
(XEN) gnttab_transfer: invalid pfn for mfn=4e74e001

except from that there's nothing unusual in any logs/debug-outputs.

Could anyone please explain to me, what could be done here?

--
-- So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish
            - Douglas Adams, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy --


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>