WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] re: xen rpm packages / fc4

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] re: xen rpm packages / fc4
From: master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:08:32 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 [CVS]-0.cvs20050812.1.fc4
Thanks for the offer Gino. That's very nice of you.

My desired end state is to have two physical xen machines, with the domU
in each dom0 failing over to the domU in the other physical machine. The
first machine is running FC4 1398 with the May release version of xen. The
other machine is yet to work.

I believe the 1398 rpms are the unstable (3.0?) tree of xen. For my
purposes, should both machines be running exactly the same version of
xen/FC4? I've not set up a cluster before.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users