WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xen + VServer

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen + VServer
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:01:29 +0100
Cc: vserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Michal Ludvig <michal@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:48:16 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42F09A70.8050105@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42F09A70.8050105@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8.2
Michal,

That's great to hear!  Xen and Vserver are IMHO highly complimentary and it'd 
be great to be able to use them together.  The VServer patch (last time I 
checked) was very nicely arch independent but I think it's quite a long time 
since anybody has tried to run it on Xen - well done!

It'd be good if a reference to this patch could be added to the Xen wiki at 
http://wiki.xensource.com so that other people know where to find it.  

Can anybody tell me if Vserver is aiming for inclusion in the mainline at any 
stage?  I'd love to see it there and for it to coexist well with Xen.

Cheers,
Mark

On Wednesday 03 August 2005 11:20, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I used to run VServer in the past and recently gave Xen a try. I pretty
> much like both of these technologies - each of them has some advantages
> that the other one can't offer. I appreciate the real independence of
> Xen domains but the memory overhead of running a kernel for each domain
> and the need to partition the memory space may become a limitation. On
> the other hand in VServer the contexts run on top of the same kernel and
> may share the available memory which may come handy in some deployments.
>
> So I decided to merge both patches and surprisingly enough - it works! I
> don't now (yet) how stable it is but the kernel booted as domU and a
> guest vserver context was created, some prcosses are running inside and
> everything looks just fine.
>
> Versions used:
> * Linux kernel 2.6.11
> * Xen 2.0-testing from yesterday
> * VServer 2.0-rc4 (last version for 2.6.11)
>
> Apply the attached patch on top of these.
>
> Xen userspace is 2.0-testing as well, util-vserver 0.30.204 (debian
> build), running on Debian Sarge.
>
> My configuration was x86, statically compiled without modules, domU with
> no physdev access, 3G/1G memspace split on x86, no preempt, no selinux.
> What else?
>
> This is the very first shot, I don't guarantee that it is stable,
> secure, etc, but if you're brave enough give it a try ;-)
>
> Michal Ludvig
> --
> * Personal homepage: http://www.logix.cz/michal

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users