Re: [Xen-users] 256M not enough for LVM snapshot, see #7 Re: Xen

Re: [Xen-users] 256M not enough for LVM snapshot, see #7 Re: Xen-users D

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] 256M not enough for LVM snapshot, see #7 Re: Xen-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 59
From:	Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:13:47 +0000
Delivery-date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:12:47 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<7b22037d05062109091793e3cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp:	id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
References:	<E1DkQep-00037f-7Z@host-192-168-0-1-bcn-london> <7b22037d05062109091793e3cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.9i

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:09:56AM -0500, Wensheng Wang wrote:
> see #7

See #7 of what?

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] 256M not enough for LVM snapshot, see #7 Re: Xen-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 59, Wensheng Wang Re: [Xen-users] 256M not enough for LVM snapshot, see #7 Re: Xen-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 59, Andy Smith <=