WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonet

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonetwork interface
From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 00:50:57 +0000
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 May 2005 00:50:15 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050509211647.GA11160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E3F35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509211647.GA11160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:16:47PM +0100, Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:09:38PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > Can you repeat on 2.0-testing or unstable?
> 
> This is a production machine unfortunately.  Its possible we may be
> able to schedule some downtime, I'll ask our sysadmin.
> 
> > Does anyone see this that's using a NIC other than an e1000?
> 
> Only one of our machines does this and it has an e1000 chipset.

Since upgrading from 2.6.10 / xen 2.0.5 to 2.6.11 / xen 2.0-testing
25/05/05 I am also seeing the following in dom0 console output.

kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

e1000 compiled in, and this is a 1U rackmount with onboard nics so
changing nic is not really an option.  This did not happen with
2.6.10/2.0.5.

Any other info that would be useful?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users