RE: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable

To:	<mlist@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:03:46 +0100
Cc:	ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xen ml <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:03:41 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcU7XSsxrCsPpsoFTeWqyvW+2w4ovAALdnZw
Thread-topic:	[Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable

> i put back all xen hosts in same subnet as dom0, so there is 
> no more multiple virtual nics | routing involved, and the 
> problems disapeared.
> 
> i soon i as i can get some spare time, i'll investigate this further

I'll be really interested to hear what's going on here. I know of a
number of people that use multiple NICs and I haven't heard of such
reports before.

Thanks,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] xen, booting up issue, Robin Green

Next by Date:

[Xen-users] Devices not available in domain, Gisbert Amm

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable, mlist

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable, mlist

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable