WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ppc-devel

Re: [XenPPC] Should the platform name be "Xen-Maple"

"platform" is build-time and comes from define_machine(). That should be
"Xen".

"machine" we can display ourselves via ppc_md.show_cpuinfo(). We can get
that from the device tree, just like CHRP does.

On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:55 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> I agree, but in our current Kernel source the string in question  
> comes from the machine description.
> Am I missing something?
> -Jx
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> 
> > Jimi, the context is that we need to modify Fedora's installer so that
> > it properly detects the system it's running on. That means we're
> > implementing a user-visible interface right now. I think "Xen- 
> > Maple" is
> > a terrible name to permanently commit ourselves to. Let's not.
> >
> > PPC's cpuinfo seems to have a split between "platform" and
> > "machine" (where machine is more specific). I think platform = Xen is
> > fine, and machine is the underlying machine.
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:56 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> >> This comes from the fact that we are running xen from an underlying
> >> host platform.
> >> for example, if you boot linux without xen but on SLOF your machine
> >> name is "Maple".
> >> see:
> >>    arch/powerpc/platforms/xen/setup.c define_machine 246
> >> define_machine(xen)
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd be interested in changing this to "Xen" for DomUs, but Dom0
> >> should reflect the underlying machine type that linux would use
> >> without Xen.
> >> -JX
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Jerone Young wrote:
> >>
> >>> In /proc/cpuinfo of a domain0 you see the following:
> >>>
> >>>  processor       : 0
> >>>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
> >>>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
> >>>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
> >>>  processor       : 1
> >>>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
> >>>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
> >>>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
> >>>  processor       : 2
> >>>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
> >>>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
> >>>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
> >>>  processor       : 3
> >>>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
> >>>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
> >>>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
> >>>  timebase        : 14318378
> >>>  platform        : Xen-Maple
> >>>
> >>> The "platform" line "Xen-Maple" is currently used by some tools in
> >>> distros to identify the platform of the machine. The question I
> >>> pose is
> >>> should this be changed from "Xen-Maple" since running on Xen does  
> >>> not
> >>> mean you are running on Maple.
> >>>
> >>> Something like "Xen" would probably be better. What do you guys
> >>> think ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
> >>> Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
> > -- 
> > Hollis Blanchard
> > IBM Linux Technology Center
> >
> 
-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel