WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] RE: bugzilla request

To: "Hollis Blanchard" <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [XenPPC] RE: bugzilla request
From: "James Bulpin" <James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:47:02 -0700
Cc: xen-ppc-devel <xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:47:20 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbFP+J43ElQawIPRU6obvcGSiUePAAAVGIA
Thread-topic: bugzilla request
Currently people monitor xen-bugs and pull out ones they can deal with.
The traffic level isn't particularly high and it wouldn't be too hard to
filter on ones without PPC in the message body.

James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hollis Blanchard [mailto:hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 21 August 2006 17:35
> To: James Bulpin
> Cc: xen-ppc-devel
> Subject: RE: bugzilla request
> 
> Let's not make PPC a component.
> 
> Is there a "bugzilla master", someone who takes 
> responsibility for xen-bugs? I'm fine with the current 
> situation as long as xen-bugs people know to assign PowerPC 
> bugs to me. The worst scenario is if xen-bugs subscribers 
> just let PPC bugs sit without assigning them anywhere.
> 
> I'd rather not subscribe to xen-bugs myself because the 
> PPC/noise ratio will likely be very low. :)
> 
> --
> Hollis Blanchard
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 11:50 -0700, James Bulpin wrote:
> > As far as I can see it is only possible to configure automatic 
> > assignment based on the component, not on the platform, 
> version, etc..
> > As a hack we could make PPC a component - what do you think?
> >
> > We don't currently do anything special for the xen-bugs@lists 
> > pseudouser; if the bug is assigned to someone else then 
> mail traffic 
> > goes to the new assignee. xen-bugs@lists was originally 
> intended to be 
> > somewhere for unassigned bugs to go.
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hollis Blanchard [mailto:hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 08 August 2006 15:57
> > > To: James Bulpin
> > > Cc: xen-ppc-devel
> > > Subject: bugzilla request
> > > 
> > > Hi James, I've started using 
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/ to track 
> > > PowerPC issues. I was wondering if we could make it so that all 
> > > Platform==PPC bugs could be assigned by default to 
> xen-ppc-devel, or 
> > > at least CCed there? (If the mail becomes too much then 
> we may want 
> > > to change that, but for now I think it should be fine.)
> > > 
> > > How does that work with the xen-bugs mailing list? When a bug is 
> > > assigned to someone, do you then put xen-bugs on CC?
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Hollis Blanchard
> > > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>