This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Handshake with secondary processors (take 2)

If it takes more than the proposed 5 secs, why bother -- your
system is dead anyway ;-)

Hmm.. ok.. I am being parnoid, I just don't trust the FW guys to leave a processor off line that may suck :)
How SLOF make sure the processor is good? does it?

Only the service processor can completely shut down a CPU, on
our blades anyway.  So the best that SLOF can do is hope for
the best.  The secondary-CPU startup code has been engineered
to be pretty much 100% failure proof though.  And a dead CPU
won't be shown in the device tree.

I guess I'm looking for a way to decide that things are bad.

There's one way we are bad right now: we require all secondary
cpu's to be started, they are not idle but running in a spinloop
somewhere.  Cache invalidate those addresses and hell breaks
loose ;-)

Not a real problem in practice, which is why I still didn't fix it.


Xen-ppc-devel mailing list