Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] fix stupid grant table flags

[Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 18:49 -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> >        laddr = (volatile unsigned long *)addr;
> >        clear_bit(lnr, laddr);
> >    }
> Why all the "volatile" here? This function isn't dereferencing those
> pointers, so it shouldn't matter?
Just wanted to retain the qualifier from clear_bit().  I suppose no  
one will call this function with a volatile so it would not hurt to  
drop it.
-JX


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel