 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-merge
[Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:50:02 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:54:46 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
What, if any, is the reason for x86-64 xenlinux to have a different __PAGE_OFFSET value than native? While merging, it would seem reasonable to drop this difference if not motivated technically. Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-merge] [PATCH] broken install, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-merge] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-merge] synch_bitops.h, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-merge] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
