WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH]Fix the logic when deassign the mmio ranges

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:32:42PM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> 
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > Could you elaborate on the concrete issue which you're seeing?
> > I guess the issue occurs when passed through pci device
> > is unplugged. But in that case, the region was occupied by
> > the device so that qemu haven't seen io on the area anyway.
> 
> For assigning a device to a hvm domain,  all mmio regions of the pci device 
> should be mapped in p2m table, but a corner case is that accessing some 
> pages(for example, vector table in msi-x's bar) in one region maybe need  
> route to qemu and emulate the corresponding logic in qemu.  In that case, we 
> have to remove the mapping for the specified pages in p2m, and let accessing 
> these pages intercepted by hyperviosr and forward the io requests to qemu.  
> But zap_domain_page_one can't intilziate the mmio p2m entries for hvm domain. 
>  Clear ?  :-)

You mean pt_iomem_map() which calls remove_msix_mapping() in
pass-through.c of qemu-dm? Is there any case other than msi-x?
I couldn't find any other usefull case because the current xen/ia64
doesn't support msi/msi-x.


> > And why GPFN_LOW_MMIO independently of addr? Shouldn't it be aware
> > of io_ranges[]?
> 
> For the low mmio ranges (3G-3.5G), we can use the fixed mfn GPFN_LOW_MMIO 
> combined with ASSIGN_io to indicate whether the p2m entries are mmio ranges.  
>  You may refer to io_ranges and it also use the fixed GPFN_LOW_MMIO to 
> intialize p2m entries for low mmio range. 

Hmm, there are two cases to call xc_domain_mempry_mapping(DPCI_REMOVE_MAPPING).
- Just to remove the entry.
  zap_domain_page_one() is wanted.

  the one in pt_iomem_map() and remove_msix_mapping() excpet called
  by pt_iomem_map()


- mmio on the area should be rounted to qemu-dm
  GPFN_LOW_MMIO and ASSIGN_io are wanted.

  remove_msix_mapping() which is called by pt_iomem_map().

Is there a way to distinguish them?

thanks,

> Xiantao
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> >> PATCH: Fix the logic when deassign the mmio ranges for vti-domain.
> >> 
> >> When de-assign the mmio range, it should resume its original value
> >> for p2m value, otherwise, it may fail to determin mmio range's type.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> diff -r 67f2e14613ef xen/arch/ia64/xen/mm.c
> >> --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/mm.c       Tue Feb 10 13:47:02 2009 +0800
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/mm.c       Tue Mar 03 15:04:54 2009 +0800
> >> @@ -1508,8 +1508,14 @@ deassign_domain_mmio_page(struct domain      
> >>      return -EINVAL; }
> >> 
> >> -    for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE )
> >> -        zap_domain_page_one(d, addr, 0, INVALID_MFN);
> >> +    for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE ) {
> >> +  if (is_hvm_domain(d))
> >> +            __assign_domain_page(d, addr, GPFN_LOW_MMIO <<
> >> PAGE_SHIFT, +                                                 
> >> ASSIGN_writable |
> >> ASSIGN_io); +      else +            zap_domain_page_one(d, addr, 0,
> >> INVALID_MFN); +    } +
> >>      return 0;
> >>  }
> >> 
> > 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 

-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel