RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH 1] X86: Adapt 32b guest os to 64b hypervisorplatform_hypercall compatibility

["Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jan,

Thanks for suggestion!
As for pct_register and psd_package, they still need translation, since
'XLAT_pct_register' and 'XLAT_psd_package' were needed in
'XLAT_processor_performance'.
As for processor_px, it's good to just checking and translate handle.
I've updated the hypercall compatible patch and sent out to xen-dev
list.

Thanks,
Jinsong

Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> 21.10.08 04:49 >>>
>> --- a/xen/include/xlat.lst   Tue Oct 07 17:23:04 2008 +0800
>> +++ b/xen/include/xlat.lst   Tue Oct 14 18:41:53 2008 +0800 @@ -55,3
>> +55,7 @@ !   processor_cx                    platform.h
>> !    processor_flags                 platform.h
>> !    processor_power                 platform.h
>> +!   pct_register                    platform.h
>> +!   processor_px                    platform.h
>> +!   psd_package                     platform.h
>> +!   processor_performance           platform.h
> 
> It would seem to me that only processor_performance needs translation,
> the other three just need checking here. That should simplify the
> actual code doing the translation, as now you don't really need to
> translate what xen_processor_performance.states points to - all you
> need to do 
> is translate the handle itself.
> 
> Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel