WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fix PAL call in physical mode.

To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fix PAL call in physical mode.
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:38:59 +1000
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:39:04 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080820072547.GF31719%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080820063907.GA15445@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080820065751.GB4597@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080820072547.GF31719%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:25:47PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:57:53PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:39:07PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > [IA64] fix PAL call in physical mode.
> > > 
> > > Now firmware code is mapped at its own virtual address space
> > > which is same to Linux. So the calculation from virutal 
> > > address to physical address should be same to the linux one.
> > > In practice firmware is located in low physical address area
> > > so that masking 60 bit instead of 61 bits doesn't make difference.
> > 
> > Can't we just get rid of #ifdef XEN ?
> > And possibly even move pal.S back into xen/arc/ia64/linux/ ?
> > 
> > I just checked and with the patch below,
> > xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/pal.S becomes the same as
> > arch/ia64/kernel/pal.S from linux 2.6.21.
> 
> Great. Moving back pal.S sounds a good idea.
> 
> [IA64] move back pal.S into xen/arch/ia64/linux.
> 
> Now xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/pal.S is the same as
> arch/ia64/kernel/pal.S from linux 2.6.21.
> So move it back into xen/arch/ia64/linux.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>