xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one iss
Thank you!
I'll fix the nested comment.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:10:38PM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > Hi Zhang.
> >
> > Could you try the attached patch?
> > This patch is for temporal work around.
> > Is it important to implement SAL_MC_SET_PARAMS and SAL_SET_VECTORS?
> > If so, they have to be implemented in both gfw and xen vmm.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
>
> Hi Isaku,
> I use your patch on latest 17677. Both sp1 and sp2 of
> VTI_Win2003server can be booted up successfully. Thanks!
> BTW, there is a little typo in your patch: (should drop the "/*" and
> "*/", or it will not success to compile)
> + * status = -1; not implemented
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:36:40AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> With Cset#17671, "qcow creating" issue was fixed! It can use qcow
> >> file to create a VTI with "disk = [ 'tap:qcow:/***,hda,w' ]" config
> >> file.
> >>
> >> One old issue still existed:
> >> ======================
> >> Windows guest still can not be booted up.
> >> --- VTI_Windows2008 can not be booted. When we ran
> >> bootmgfw.efi, it would also report failure in the qemu screen.
> >> --- VTI_Windows2003, both SP1 and SP2 guest will crash at
> >> "starting windows..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Detail Xen/IA64 Unstable Cset #17671 Status Report
> >>
> >> ============================================================
> >> Test Result Summary:
> >> # total case: 18
> >> # passed case: 15
> >> # failed case: 3
> >> ============================================================
> >> Testing Environment:
> >> platform: Tiger4
> >> processor: Itanium 2 Processor
> >> logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Dual Core)
> pal
> >> version: 9.08 service os: RHEL4u3 IA64 SMP with 2 VCPUs
> >> vti guest os: RHEL4u2 & RHEL4u3
> >> xenU guest os: RHEL4u2
> >> xen ia64 unstable tree: 17671
> >> xen schedule: credit
> >> gfw: open guest firmware Cset#122
> >> ============================================================
> >> Detailed Test Results:
> >>
> >> Passed case id Description
> >> Save&Restore Save&Restore
> >> VTI_PV Linux VTI PV
> >> Two_UP_VTI_Co2 UP_VTI (mem=256)
> >> One_UP_VTI 1 UP_VTI (mem=256)
> >> One_UP_XenU 1 UP_xenU(mem=256)
> >> SMPVTI_LTP VTI (vcpus=4, mem=512) run LTP
> >> SMPVTI_and_SMPXenU 1 VTI + 1 xenU (mem=256 vcpus=2)
> >> Two_SMPXenU_Coexist 2 xenU (mem=256, vcpus=2)
> >> One_SMPVTI_4096M 1 VTI (vcpus=2, mem=4096M)
> >> SMPVTI_Network 1 VTI (mem=256,vcpu=2) and'ping'
> >> SMPXenU_Network 1 XenU (vcpus=2) and 'ping'
> >> One_SMP_XenU 1 SMP xenU (vcpus=2)
> >> One_SMP_VTI 1 SMP VTI (vcpus=2)
> >> SMPVTI_Kernel_Build VTI (vcpus=4) and do KernelBuild
> >> UPVTI_Kernel_Build 1 UP VTI and do kernel build
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> (all the cases containing windows VTI)
> >> Failed case id Description
> >> SMPVTI_Windows SMPVTI windows(vcpu=2)
> >> SMPWin_SMPVTI_SMPxenU SMPVTI Linux/Windows & XenU
> >> VTI_Windows_PV Windows VTI PV
> >> ============================================================
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Zhang Jingke
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Zhang Jingke
>
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- oneissue fixed, one issue still existed, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed,
Isaku Yamahata <=
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, SUZUKI Kazuhiro
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- oneissue fixed, one issue still existed, Zhang, Xing Z
|
Previous by Date: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, Zhang, Jingke |
Next by Date: |
[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17677 Status Report, Zhang, Jingke |
Previous by Thread: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, Zhang, Jingke |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17671 Status Report --- one issue fixed, one issue still existed, SUZUKI Kazuhiro |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|