Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] necessary of `handling regNaT fault' message

[Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Applied, thanks.

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:21:34PM +0900, KUWAMURA Shin'ya wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Running i386 version LMbench on IA32-EL of dom0 generates many
> message outputs: # tens of lines per a second
>   (XEN) ia64_handle_reflection: handling regNaT fault
> 
> Is the check required?
> 
> I attached the patch that remove printk().
> 
> How to reproduce:
> 1. build LMbench on an i386 machine
> 2. run par_mem on ia64
>    cd <LMbench directory>/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu
>    ./par_mem -L 128 -M 16M
> 
> Best Regards,

> # HG changeset patch
> # User KUWAMURA Shin'ya <kuwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> # Date 1207901130 -32400
> # Node ID 6713ab838e777d4a408880ebc4373eb586ef5036
> # Parent  feee6422144f1a7b9caa91e178244214e8c2e14e
> [IA64] Remove regNaT fault message
> 
> Signed-off-by: KUWAMURA Shin'ya <kuwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff -r feee6422144f -r 6713ab838e77 xen/arch/ia64/xen/faults.c
> --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/faults.c      Tue Apr 01 11:29:03 2008 -0600
> +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/faults.c      Fri Apr 11 17:05:30 2008 +0900
> @@ -626,8 +626,6 @@ ia64_handle_reflection(unsigned long ifa
>               if (((isr >> 4L) & 0xfL) == 1) {
>                       /* Fault is due to a register NaT consumption fault. */
>                       //regs->eml_unat = 0;  FIXME: DO WE NEED THIS??
> -                     printk("ia64_handle_reflection: handling regNaT "
> -                            "fault\n");
>                       vector = IA64_NAT_CONSUMPTION_VECTOR;
>                       break;
>               }

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel