Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()

To:	Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()
From:	tgingold@xxxxxxx
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:55:07 +0200
Cc:	xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:03:36 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200706191555.40995.dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<200706191555.40995.dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5

Quoting Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> What is the sense of the 0x700 ? Currently Xen doesn't use protection keys.
> So why is this explicitly set here?
> Many thanks for any hints!

I suppose this is debugging code. I can't see any other reason too.
Fujitsu people may confirm.

Tristan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()