|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] allow conflicted rid allocation for>64
Hi Kanno.
Thank you very much.
Before trying >64 domains, we can test its logic with
>32, >16, >8 or >4 domains using dom_rid_bits options.
>64 domains test is needed before commit, off course.
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:50:48PM +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
> Hi Isaku,
>
> We have a environment of creating 60 domains, but do not have
> a environment of creating more domains than it.
> Could you give us time of preparations? We will try your patches.
>
> Best regards,
> Kan and Fujitsu-team
>
> >It seems that we're approaching 64 domain limit.
> >Here's the experimental patch which removes it.
> >
> >I don't think that just reducing rid bits given to guest OS is
> >enough because presumably we need domains more than 128, 256 or
> >512 ... eventually.
> >So my approach is to allow rid regions to conflict.
> >I haven't test it with >64 domains because my environment
> >doesn't have enough memory to boot so many domains.
> >But I tested it with dom_rid_bits=23 xen boot option.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >--
> >yamahata
> >
> >-------------------------------text/plain-------------------------------
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
|
|
|
|