On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 10:02 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
> >Do VTI domains implement enough ACPI to provide the OS a fake S5 power
> >state? If not, a PV-on-HVM driver could set pm_power_off and use a
> >hypercall, but that means HVM domains would need a Xen driver for some
> >pretty basic functionality. Maybe all vcpus in cpu_halt() should only
> >be cause for a domain shutdown for VTI domains?
> Hmm. Some OSes on VTI may use cpu_halt() on all vcpu.
> So I add printk like "call PAL_HALT on all cpu",
> and call domain_shutdown() for VTI domain.
> Is this OK?
Hi Akio,
I would prioritize a poweroff shutting down a domain over halt making
a domain stall. So for VTI domains, this sounds ok. I'd skip the
printk though, it seems overly verbose. Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home