This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5][IA64][HVM] Windowscrash

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5][IA64][HVM] Windowscrashdump support
From: Tristan Gingold <tgingold@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:04:19 +0100
Cc: Tristan Gingold <tgingold@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Masaki Kanno <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:00:10 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C1DBEA29.8176%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070123163253.GA4559@saphi> <C1DBEA29.8176%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:36:57PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 23/1/07 16:32, "Tristan Gingold" <tgingold@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Maybe os-init is not the best command name as you say. If you have idea
> >> of command name, could you send it?
> > something like
> > xm trigger init|reset|nmi
> This could be acceptable, mapping to a domctl command with type enumeration
> argument. Specifying vcpu would indeed make sense. It's not clear that such
> a flexible interface would really be needed (maybe xm os-dump <vcpu> would
> suffice, mapping to the usual 'hardware dump switch' method for the
> particular architecture?) but it's better than 'xm os-init' which I
> definitely dislike, and maybe the extra flexibility could turn out to be
> useful.
For sure this is an export-only command.
I don't really like the xm os-dump name, because the action of init/nmi is
up to the domain.  It may or not dump.


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>