|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] kexec: framework and i386 (Take XIV)
 
| 
To:  | 
Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] kexec: framework and i386 (Take XIV) | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:21:17 +0900 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Kazuo Moriwaka <moriwaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Zou, Nanhai" <nanhai.zou@xxxxxxxxx>,	Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Magnus Damm <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 04:12:58 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<A6C6CDA30C4336takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<20060831074259.GB23148@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<88C6CCDB437DC3takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20060901025610.GE31034@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<A5C6CDA26D3151takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<A6C6CDA30C4336takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Debian) | 
 
 
 
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 05:45:59PM +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
> >Hi, Horms
> >
> >>That seems like a good idea to me. Though I think you are missing { }.
> >>Can you test to see if this works?
> >Oops, You're right. But I think unknown_nmi_error() is not called,
> >because crash_kexec() is called before that.
> Sorry.
> In the only case of CONFIG_KEXEC=y, the above is right.
Yes, I think that is the case. I will put your patch into the kexec
series, as I think that it is a worthy addition.
-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |