WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: cleanup in dom_fw.c

To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: cleanup in dom_fw.c
From: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:31:07 +0200
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:26:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1156546985.5555.13.camel@lappy>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200608251357.59322.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx> <1156546985.5555.13.camel@lappy>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Le Samedi 26 Août 2006 01:03, Alex Williamson a écrit :
> On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 13:57 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch is mostly a cleanup of dom_fw.c.  I have added comments, new
> > structure. The memmap handling for dom0 is now grouped which is IMHO more
> > clear.
> >
> > Also, hypercall stubs and fw tables now only use 1 page instead of 2 MB. 
> > This saves memory a little bit!
> >
> > I have also fixed two bugs: sal systab checksum and memory type for fw
> > table area.
>
>    Applied.  I had to add back the dom0 passthrough for
> EFI_RESERVED_TYPE memory.  I have at least one system that uses that
> range for ACPI tables, so it was rather unhappy booting without that
> range mapped.  Thanks,
Argh, Ok.
I though RESERVED was unused (at least according to the spec !)

Tristan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>