Very clear now! Thank you very much.
-Xiantao
OTC,Intel Corporation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2006年7月27日 17:36
> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx; Chris Wright;
> fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Akio
> Takebe
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
>
> Hi, Xiantao
>
> Yes, you are right.
> And I think you must use the following patch.
>
> Now I cannot boot by using xen-ia64-unstable
> (not linux-2.6-xen-fedora) on FC6.
> I'm debuging it.
> Then I'll try to boot by using xen-ia64-unstable/xen and linux-2.6-xen-
> fedora.
>
> diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b
>
> static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> - return chip->vendor->buffersize;
> + return chip->vendor.buffersize;
> }
>
> extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *);
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Akio Takebe
>
> >Hi Akio,
> > Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should
> be
> >latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron's patches on it. right? In
> >addition, what's status about it?
> >BTW,
> >
> >Thanks & Best Regards
> >-Xiantao
> >
> >OTC,Intel Corporation
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47
> >> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx; Chris Wright;
> >> fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
> >> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
> >>
> >> Hi, Xiantao
> >>
> >> BZ's patch is old.
> >> Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree.
> >> So I think we should use Aron's patches.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Akio Takebe
> >>
> >> >Hi Aron,
> >> > Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through your
>
> >>
> >> >mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora. But when
> >> >I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any
> >> >suggestion for contributing to Fedora ?
> >> >Thanks & Best Regards
> >> >-Xiantao
> >> >
> >> >OTC,Intel Corporation
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: fedora-xen-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >> On Behalf Of Aron Griffis
> >> >> Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11
> >> >> To: Juan Quintela
> >> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx; Chris Wright;
> >> >> fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx; Alex Williamson;
> >> >> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Juan,
> >> >>
> >> >> These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me working on
> >> >> fixing
> >> >> the
> >> >> ia64 build of your tree. At this point the bare-metal Linux kernel
> >> >> builds and
> >> >> boots. The xen kernel builds but doesn't complete booting.
> >> >> Nonetheless,
> >> >> since
> >> >> these patches seem to take us most of the way there, we'd like to
> >> >> request
> >> >> them
> >> >> to be applied to your tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Aron
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home