Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] per vcpu VHPT

On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:

> I don't understand why the per-vcpu patch relies on tlb-tracking.  Is it for 
> convienience ?

It was just because of the patch order in my local repository.
It seems to be likely that the per-vcpu vhpt patch will be accepted
before the tlb-trackig patch. So I reordered them now.

> Because I like flexibility, I'd vote for integrating this patch.  However I'd 
> vote for removing #if CONFIG_XEN_IA64_PERVCPU_VHPT.  The command line option 
> is good and the overhead should be very small.

The most of ifdef can be removed.
They were there for maintenance to mark modifications because
I expected that it would take a while to accept.
I attached the cleaned-up patch which isn't depend on the tlb tracking patch.

-- 
yamahata

10701:28e7938f2e6e_pervcpu_vhpt.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] per vcpu VHPT, Isaku Yamahata Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] per vcpu VHPT, Isaku Yamahata Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] per vcpu VHPT, Tristan Gingold Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] per vcpu VHPT, Isaku Yamahata <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Add IA64-specific code for new qemu., Zhang, Xiantao

Next by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: ivt.S cleanup, Alex Williamson

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] per vcpu VHPT, Tristan Gingold

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH][XEND]Fix memory allocation for VTi domain with new Qemu on xen-unstagle.hg, Zhang, Xiantao

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]