On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:19:39PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Le Lundi 03 Juillet 2006 15:00, Isaku Yamahata a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:45:08PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > > Why not adding the 'int last_cpu' field in the struct arch_vcpu ?
> > > If two vcpus are running on the same cpu, the VHPT is always up to date.
> >
> > Since there is no gurantee that both two vcpu map
> > (rid, virtual address) to a same pseudo physical address,
> > VHPT and mTLB must be flushed everytime vcpu is switched.
> > If they aren't flushed, it is highly likey that the per cpu variable
> > area will be broken.
> You are correct about percpu area.
Probably now I understand whan you were seeing.
Please see the attached patch.
--
yamahata
10570:a55e5195e5f7_more_vcpu_migration.patch
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|