Hi Alex,
I looked into the code about reference of ACPI table.
Single instance seems to be OK but I can't guarantee it.
So I wrote ACPI tables walking code.
The code isn't a big deal. How about this?
Attached patch is work around and not fully tested yet.
(It works on Tiger and PRIMEQUEST)
Thanks,
Kouya
Alex Williamson writes:
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:34 +0900, Kouya SHIMURA wrote:
> > Hi Tristan,
> >
> > Thanks for comment.
> > Sorry for my assumption. I revised a patch.
> > Yeah, this is tedious... but becomes more small. :-)
>
> Hi Kouya,
>
> This is a good start. One problem, acpi_table_parse() is meant for
> tables that can only have a single instance. There might be others, but
> I know that at a minimum we need to handle multiple SSDTs. Can you look
> to see what it would take to support that? We might need our own
> function to manually walk all the tables. Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
>
assign_dom0_acpi_table.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home