WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: VTI hitting the blocked state (was RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE:[Xen-ia64-d

To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: VTI hitting the blocked state (was RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE:[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Add fullevtchnmechanism for xen/ia64)
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:04:50 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 24 May 2006 19:06:38 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZ/Y6LOifI/Via4RKm7bgbOCdZkRwAOyn3Q
Thread-topic: VTI hitting the blocked state (was RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE:[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Add fullevtchnmechanism for xen/ia64)
>From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年5月25日 2:55
>
>On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 09:46 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 23:48 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> >    It appeared to be stuck in the "-b----" state as shown by xm list,
>> > but let me do some verification tomorrow.  Thanks for testing this.
>I'm
>> > running UP dom0 + 4-way SMP domU + UP domVTI on an 8 thread
>(4 core)
>> > system.  Thanks,
>>
>>    Actually, running networking in domU concurrently accelerates the
>> problem, but is not required.  I hit it again with only a domVTI
>> running.  I'm pulling a 512MB empty file from another server and
>writing
>> it to /dev/null using wget.  At some point it just stops and xm list
>> reports the domain as blocked.  There's nothing in xend.log or
>> xend-debug.log to indicate something went bad.  The qemu-dm
>process has
>> select listed in it's wait channel, so seems like it's ok.  Thanks,
>
>  I hit this again building a kernel in a domVTI (RHEL4U3 guest).  I was
>only using the network for an ssh login.  The build ran for a while,
>consumed 3600+ seconds as reported by xm list, but is now stuck in the
>blocked state.  Thanks,
>
>       Alex

VTI network has not been tested aggressively and thus your observation 
is new and we'll take a look.

I'll try again by following your steps. As a confirmation required from you:
        - Simple dom0+domVTI can trigger the block issue. DomU can 
accelerate
        - dom0 and domVTI are running on different processors.
        - can that happen steadily? If not, how about the frequency.
        - which test case do you propose to try? 'wget' or KB. Previously I 
always try with wget.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>