WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: dom_rid_bits command line parameter

To: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: dom_rid_bits command line parameter
From: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:00:48 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:56:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD5AEC020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD5AEC020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Le Vendredi 14 Avril 2006 16:39, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) a 
écrit :
> I suggest changing the comment from "host rid space is shared
> among the domains" to "host rid space is partitioned among
> the domains". 
Ok.

> Also it might be wise to complain/panic if
> dom_rid_bits is set > 22.  If 23, only dom0 can run (no domUs).
This may be still useful.
Also note:
        printf ("Maximum of simultaneous domains: %d\n",
                (1 << (implemented_rid_bits - domain_rid_bits_default)) - 1);

> Perhaps also if dom_rid_bits is set at all, a descriptive
> message should be printed stating "dom_rid_bits is set to xx;
> each domain has yy rids".
Ok.

> Should dom_rid_bits < 18 be allowed?  Architecturally the
> answer is no, but if all guests support it, a system adminstrator
> might choose to make the tradeoff (worse performance in each
> domain for more concurrent domains).
It is useless to allow it unless you redefine IA64_MIN_IMPL_RID_BITS.  This is 
due to:

if (ridbits < IA64_MIN_IMPL_RID_BITS)
                ridbits = IA64_MIN_IMPL_RID_BITS;

Thank you for your comments,
Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>