WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]

To: "'You, Yongkang'" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
From: "yo.fujita" <yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:24:03 +0900
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 01:23:08 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16A54BF5D6E14E4D916CE26C9AD30575031C958E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZEDF+1PCTggY0wSQyGU0DWSH8umgADP6WwAACmYQAAA8QqwAANweugAHW2zyA=
Hi YongKang,

> EM〜 From the log, there are only 4 failed cases. Two are known float
issue.
> The other 2 names are related to socket, it may related no network in
XenU.
I think so.

This is detailed result of socket01.
socket01    1  PASS  :  invalid domain successful
socket01    2  PASS  :  invalid type successful
socket01    3  PASS  :  UNIX domain dgram successful
socket01    4  FAIL  :  raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected -1),
errno 93 (expected 94)
socket01    5  PASS  :  UDP socket successful
socket01    6  FAIL  :  UDP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
(expected 94)
socket01    7  FAIL  :  TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
(expected 94)
socket01    8  PASS  :  TCP socket successful
socket01    9  FAIL  :  ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
(expected 94)

Similarly, it's socketpair01.
socketpair01    1  PASS  :  invalid domain successful
socketpair01    2  PASS  :  invalid type successful
socketpair01    3  PASS  :  UNIX domain dgram successful
socketpair01    4  FAIL  :  raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected
-1), errno 93 (expected 94)
socketpair01    5  PASS  :  bad pointer successful
socketpair01    6  PASS  :  bad pointer successful
socketpair01    7  PASS  :  UDP socket successful
socketpair01    8  FAIL  :  TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
(expected 94)
socketpair01    9  PASS  :  TCP socket successful
socketpair01   10  FAIL  :  ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno
93 (expected 94)

Does your result match to this?
It might be due to the environment if differing.

Thanks,
Fujita
 
> Best Regards,
> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of nakato
> >Sent: 2006年3月10日 19:51
> >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
> >
> >Hi.
> >I'm Watanabe, co-worker of Fujita.
> >He's going out now for his unavoidable reason,
> >so I'll send the report instead today.
> >
> >TEST RESULT
> >      5/816 FAIL (Please see the attached files)
> >
> >Thanks.
> >Watanabe Takehiko
> >
> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> Hi YongKang,
> >>
> >> No, I doesn't try LTP on dom0 yet.
> >> I will execute it now.
> >> I will inform the result later.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Fujita
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: You, Yongkang [mailto:yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:06 PM
> >> > To: yo.fujita; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
> >> >
> >> > Hi Fujita,
> >> >
> >> > Did you try to run LTP and get the results in xen0 environment?
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> >> >
> >> > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> >> yo.fujita
> >> > >Sent: 2006年3月10日 14:32
> >> > >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [3/2nd week]
> >> > >
> >> > >Hi, all
> >> > >
> >> > >I will inform this week's benchmark result.
> >> > >
> >> > >The tool used now is as follows.
> >> > > - unixbench4.1.0
> >> > > - bonnie++-1.03
> >> > > - ltp-full-20051205
> >> > > - iozone3_191
> >> > > - lmbench-3.0-a5
> >> > >
> >> > >TEST ENVIRONMENT
> >> > >    Machine          : Tiger4
> >> > >    KERN             : 2.6.16-rc5-xenU
> >> > >    changeset        : 9157:a693ccb4d581
> >> > >    Dom0 OS          : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
> >> > >    DomU OS          : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
> >> > >    No. of DomU's    : 1
> >> > >
> >> > >SUMMARY:
> >> > >     - DomU came to do boot successfully!
> >> > >issues:
> >> > >     -
> >> > >
> >> > >TEST RESULT
> >> > >    unixbench4.1.0    : PASS
> >> > >    bonnie++-1.03    : PASS
> >> > >    ltp-full-20051205 : 51/816 FAIL (Please see the attached files)
> >> > >    iozone3_191       : PASS
> >> > >    lmbench-3.0-a5    : PASS
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks and best regards,
> >> > >Fujita and Fujitsu members
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel