WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] IOSAPIC virtualisation

To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, "Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] IOSAPIC virtualisation
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:38:17 -0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:49:18 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYr+JLvX7HDxb5PSzeDDaUOQC6rJAAFKbLw
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] IOSAPIC virtualisation
Is SMP working again with this latest patch?

http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2006-02/msg00024.html 

Thanks,
Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 6:58 AM
> To: Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)
> Cc: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); 
> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] IOSAPIC virtualisation
> 
> Le Vendredi 03 Février 2006 17:13, Alex Williamson a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 09:33 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> [...]
> >    I agree that we can't hit this problem right now, but 
> it's easy to
> > fix and would be one less thing we might miss when we do 
> enable driver
> > domains.  It looks the block of code to mask the vector 
> could be copied
> > identically into the section to unmask the vector with the 
> appropriate
> > s/mask_vec/unmask_vec and setting of the rte values.  I 
> guess it keeps
> > catching my eye because the mask and unmask are not 
> symmetric.  Thanks,
> Hi,
> 
> I have slightly modified the patch so that it looks almost symmetric.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tristan.
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel