WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical address:a000f00100cf00

To: "Matthew Chapman" <matthewc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical address:a000f00100cf0000
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:08:44 -0800
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:16:23 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYc/OsmPDcW0vNwQOCEpONbn2qR3gADNoHg
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical address:a000f00100cf0000
I haven't seen a failure this early in domain0 boot for
a long time.  One possible machine difference that I think
has come up before: Some machines zero memory as part of
boot/reset and others don't.  Maybe yours is not and this
is resulting in some uninitialized memory getting used,
which is harmless if it is zero?

I think Kevin suggested a patch a while back... I don't
recall offhand if that found its way into the tree.
Perhaps you can check? Or it might be a similar problem
elsewhere.

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Matthew Chapman
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 6:33 AM
> To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical 
> address:a000f00100cf0000
> 
> The current Xen/ia64 tree doesn't work for me, Dom0 dies here:
> 
> Memory: 491056k/523264k available (11335k code, 31600k 
> reserved, 4831k data, 304k init)
> (XEN) vcpu_translate: bad physical address: a000f00100cf0000 
> @ a0000001000080d0 (kr7=000000000ccec000)
> [machine check]
> 
> The erroneous fault is in vhpt_miss while handling a region 5
> miss (the first, from ia64_patch_gate).  The address comes from:
> 
>   LOAD_PHYSICAL(p6, r19, swapper_pg_dir)
> 
> which is a movl which is patched into a physical address by
> ia64_patch_vtop.
> 
> The unpatched value is 0xa000000100cf0000, and it should have
> been patched to 0xccf0000.  Having added some debug output to
> ia64_patch_imm64, it seems that tpa produces the right value, and
> it tries to patch it.
> 
> However, something obviously goes wrong, since the address above
> is neither the unpatched address nor the intended physical
> address.
> 
> Anyone seen this before?
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical address:a000f00100cf0000, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=