WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix

To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:08:22 +0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:14:01 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYRPAJZIZgfBETgQqSYCAJ57rDDmwABIfgA
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年1月4日 23:34
>
>Le Mercredi 04 Janvier 2006 13:26, Tian, Kevin a écrit :
>> Hi, Dan,
>>      Attached is another important Xen/ia64 fix to enable domU/vbd
>> working on system with >1G hole in dom0's memory layout. Once memmap of
>> dom0 is virtualized, there's no way for dom0 to access machine frames
>> (like from domU) which is outside of EFI memory layout known by dom0,
>> because of no mapping. So we have to disable CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP
>> explicitly, to ensure dom0 constructing a physical memmap array.
>[...]
>Hmm, this side effect is very interesting.
>
>If Xen requires virtual_mem_map, then dom0 will require it too.
>Since dom0 can't work yet with virtual_mem_map, enabling it in Xen is moot,
>isn't it ?
>
>Tristan.

Seems like that. If we add phys2mach (p!=m) concept into dom0, that's not the 
issue then. ;-)

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel