WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support

To: "Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:35:12 -0800
Cc: "Johnson, Brett E \(Linux R&D - FTC\)" <brett@xxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:34:48 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcX22Jrg5nw3iNrGS2Wt+hAFSZlARAAnt1kg
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support
Sounds good.  New xelilo.efi (and README) committed. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev) 
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:38 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Cc: Yang, Fred; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Johnson, 
> Brett E (Linux R&D - FTC)
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support
> 
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 15:21 -0800, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> Collins) wrote:
> > Looks good.  Unless there is a commitment to have a binary
> > image somewhere "any day now", I think we should still leave
> > a binary in the xen hg tree.   I don't think we should require
> > Xen users to build a new version of elilo from source.
> > 
> > Is your binary OK for that?
> 
>    I'm hoping it's any day now, but better safe than sorry.  
> I'd include
> my binary and remove it when there's one on the sf.net page.  Thanks,
> 
>       Alex
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>