Rebuilding once again from a fresh clone, I am able
to boot successfully to a login prompt. So, I am
going to request that Keir pull this into xen-unstable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: Tian, Kevin; Matt Chapman
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Adapt to new evtchn interface
> (RE:[Xen-ia64-devel]Changes to virq/irq interface in xen-unstable)
>
> OK, I think I found the problem... blkfront no longer
> gets config'd by default due to a recent change in
> xen-unstable that allows blkfront to be a module.
>
> When I fixed this, I was able to boot a second domain...
> as far as the root disk getting mounted and kernel memory
> being freed, but... I forgot to disable CONFIG_VT.
> When I rebuilt with CONFIG_VT off, the second domain
> failed with an error about no vbd backend! So I need
> more investigation but thought I would report progress
> and I have committed the fix (to config in blkfront).
>
> Dan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> > Of Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 10:19 AM
> > To: Tian, Kevin; Matt Chapman
> > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Adapt to new evtchn interface (RE:
> > [Xen-ia64-devel]Changes to virq/irq interface in xen-unstable)
> >
> > OK, I have merged this with the latest xen-unstable and
> > updated xen-ia64-unstable with the merge.
> >
> > I wasn't able to boot multiple domains with the result,
> > but it was probably pilot error (I will start over from
> > scratch and retry). But it is also possible that another
> > xen-unstable change in the last two days has broken
> > xen/ia64 multiple domain support again. :-(
> >
> > Could you test with xen-ia64-unstable tip? If it works
> > for you (or if I get it to work on my retry), I will ask
> > Keir to pull. If not, could you look through the xen-unstable
> > csets since the last working version?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:17 AM
> > > To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Matt Chapman
> > > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Adapt to new evtchn interface (RE:
> > > [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface in xen-unstable)
> > >
> > > Hi, Dan,
> > > Attached is the necessary change on ia64 side to adapt
> > > new evtchn interface from Keir. What I did is to pull Rev
> > > 7699 ("Rationalise the kernel event-channel binding
> > > interfaces. The") into xen-ia64-unstable.hg. (Before
> > > vcpu_translate patch).
> > >
> > > Now I've just confirmed domU and domVTI (with
> > > yesterday's patch) still working for me. And you can make a
> > try then.
> > >
> > > BTW, because the Rev 7699 from xen-unstable.hg also
> > > modifies evtchn_ia64.c which may conflict with Rev7664 from
> > > xen-ia64-unstable.hg (for notify_remote_via_irq). So I
> > > attached both patch and modified evtchn_ia64.c, in case it
> > > can't be applied cleanly.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> > > [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
> > > >Sent: 2005年11月10日 7:48
> > > >To: Tian, Kevin; Matt Chapman
> > > >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface
> > > in xen-unstable
> > > >
> > > >Kevin, Matt --
> > > >
> > > >I started to look at these changes but I am not as familiar
> > > >with this code as you and, since multiple domains is just
> > > >now working again, I am hesitant to mess with it. Could
> > > >one or both of you provide a patch to fix up ia64 to
> > > >match Keir's interface change?
> > > >
> > > >This is relatively URGENT as I believe this is the only
> > > >fix still needed to get ia64 multiple domains working in
> > > >the xen-unstable tree. (Hopefully, no recent or near-future
> > > >changes in xen-unstable will break it before we are able
> > > >to merge again.) Once we have it working in xen-unstable,
> > > >it will be much easier to find problems if something breaks.
> > > >And it is very likely that the Xen 3.0 freeze is coming soon
> > > >and it would be nice to have it in-tree before the freeze.
> > > >
> > > >You may want to clone the xen-unstable tree as a base and
> > > >apply Kevin's recent patch (see xen-ia64-unstable cset 7664).
> > > >This should work unless another recent xen-unstable cset
> > > >has broken us again, which we would like to know now rather
> > > >than later anyway.
> > > >
> > > >It appears we need to implement bind_virq_to_irqhandler
> > > >and unbind_from_irqhandler. I think bind_ipi_to_irqhandler is
> > > >probably just a panic stub for now until we have SMP guest
> > > >support.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >Dan
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:35 PM
> > > >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins);
> > > >> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface
> > > >> in xen-unstable
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, not many changes required for ia64 and some simple stubs
> > > >> are enough. Actually that's a good way to go. However
> > > >> currently I'm still stuck on the environmental issue related
> > > >> possibly to udev or hotplug, which preventing "xm create"
> > > >> executed correctly. Hope other guys interested in this issue
> > > >> can also make a try to see how quick we can solve it easily.
> > > >> ;-) Once it's solved, we can adapt to Keir's changes and
> > then test.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Kevin
> > > >> >-----Original Message-----
> > > >> >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > > >> Behalf Of Magenheimer,
> > > >> >Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> > > >> >Sent: 2005年11月9日 1:33
> > > >> >To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Changes to virq/irq interface in
> > > >> xen-unstable
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Kevin, would you take a look at this? The changes are
> > > >> >probably not hard, but until multiple domains is up on
> > > >> >tip, I can't test and don't want to break your work.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Keir's changes are in xen-unstable cset 7699.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Dan
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:08 AM
> > > >> >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> > > >> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >> Subject: Re: Please pull xen-ia64-unstable
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 7 Nov 2005, at 18:45, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> > > >> >> Collins) wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Please pull
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-ia64-unstable.hg
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Merged up thru xen-unstable cset 7642.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Okay, pulled through. I noticed that the event-channel
> > > >> >> interfaces still
> > > >> >> cause problems (bind_virq_to_irq in particular). I've had
> > > >> >> another go at
> > > >> >> rationalising the binding interface in light of this, so
> > > >> you now need
> > > >> >> to implement:
> > > >> >> bind_evtchn_to_irq --- same as it ever was
> > > >> >> bind_virq_to_irqhandler --- replaces bind_virq_to_irq
> > > >> >> bind_ipi_to_irqhandler --- replaces bind_ipi_to_irq
> > > >> >> unbind_from_irqhandler --- common unbind function
> > > that replaces
> > > >> >> unbind_evtchn_from_irqhandler, unbind_virq_from_irq and
> > > >> >> unbind_ipi_from_irq
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> This interface eliminates all evtchn-related ia64 ifdefs in
> > > >> >> common code.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -- Keir
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:48 AM
> > > >> >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> > > >> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >> Subject: Re: Please pull xen-ia64-unstable
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 8 Nov 2005, at 15:41, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> > > >> >> Collins) wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Great, thanks! Are these new interfaces checked into
> > > >> >> > xen-unstable yet? I can't find the changeset.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> They have to get through our automatic regression tests.
> > > >> Assuming all
> > > >> >> goes well the changes should be pushed in less than an hour,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -- Keir
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >_______________________________________________
> > > >> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> > > >> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home