WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: ar.unat

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: ar.unat
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:07:13 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 02:04:15 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXf7/qlxt/UBLYXQj6idPbhpb4eQQAKxkpQ
Thread-topic: ar.unat
Hi Dan,

I can take a look at this, please send me regcheck utilty.


Thanks
Anthony



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年11月3日 4:57
>To: Xu, Anthony
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: ar.unat
>
>Hi Anthony --
>
>I recall that some time ago (around the time of the merge)
>you submitted some patches related to fixing ar.unat saving
>and restoring.
>
>I recently rediscovered my copy of Tony Luck's ia64 regcheck
>utility and ran it.  According to regcheck on tip, ar.unat is
>not getting saved/restored properly.  Earlier this summer,
>regcheck reported no problems with ar.unat.  I also tried
>turning off fast_reflect (as I vaguely recall there was
>a problem there and there is still some #ifdef's there
>related to ar.unat) but regcheck still reports ar.unat
>problems.
>
>Are you expecting (after your patches) that ar.unat is
>now working properly?  The change reported by regcheck
>may have happened from any changeset, but since you have
>submitted patches around this area, I thought you might
>be able to shed some light, or at least see if you could
>reproduce the problem.  Do you have Tony Luck's regcheck
>tool?
>
>Thanks,
>Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>