WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:40:52 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:38:18 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXP2HRI83rf2/ODRBuc5moDrgGuwgAGusrwAAqDThAABKMkoAAL0j3A
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable
We shouldn't see any Nat faults. And I didn't see Nat faults on my test.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年10月14日 3:59
>To: Xu, Anthony
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fixed some bugs to make xen0 more stable
>
>> However, my testing is not going well so far.  I had just
>> completed compiling Linux 15 times on tip (with Tristan's
>> SMP patch) without any problems, but 2 of 5 runs so far with
>> this new patch failed with segment faults.
>
>Followed by six successful builds :-%
>
>I'm going to assume this is a random occurrence of a bug
>unrelated to your patch that happens to occur only every
>few hours or so and will commit your patch.
>
>By the way, I am now seeing two NaT faults per Linux build
>that are printing "attempting to handle as privop."
>I assume your fix exposed these but the messages are
>harmless?
>
>Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>