Dan,
As I mentioned before, I haven't tested the patch on xenolinux. Maybe
there is an address collision, I'll take a look at this, make sure it
can boot xenolinux, and send a new patch to you.
Thanks,
Anthony
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>[mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:22 PM
>To: Yang, Fred; Xu, Anthony
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [elilo-discuss] a patch to
>make eliloloadanother module
>
>> Time to call it a week! Bye!
>
>Alright, I admit it, I couldn't quit yet!
>
>I added Anthony's patch (last version I got) and see the
>same result: machine reboots with no console output.
>
>I added an infinite loop of printf's at the beginning
>of construct_dom0 and it doesn't get that far (whereas
>a normal RHEL3 boot still works fine). I'd have to
>guess that the initrd is getting loaded in memory
>at a "bad" place which is killing Xen very early.
>
>NOW, time to call it a week.
>
>Dan
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>> Of Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 5:04 PM
>> To: Yang, Fred; Xu, Anthony
>> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [elilo-discuss] a patch to
>> make eliloloadanother module
>>
>> Another update... This problem goes away when I
>> specify verbose=3 (or verbose=2) at the beginning
>> of my elilo.conf file. With verbose off, or with
>> verbose=1, I get the load error. Weird...
>>
>> So on to the next step... the module (the RHEL4
>> initrd) gets loaded but after a few seconds (and
>> no console output), the system reboots. This is
>> probably not unexpected as I haven't yet patched
>> Xen itself (awaiting latest patch from Anthony).
>>
>> Time to call it a week! Bye!
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>> > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:36 PM
>> > To: 'Yang, Fred'; 'Xu, Anthony'
>> > Cc: 'xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>> > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [elilo-discuss] a patch to
>> > make elilo loadanother module
>> >
>> > I got some help from a local Red Hat guru and got to
>> > the next step... the modified elilo fails with:
>> >
>> > Loading xen....done
>> > Loading initrd xenlinux...done
>> > initrd.c(line 77):Failed to allocate 318 pages for initrd
>> > Start of netboot failed: Load Error
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>> > > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:14 PM
>> > > To: 'Yang, Fred'; Xu, Anthony
>> > > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [elilo-discuss] a patch to
>> > > make elilo loadanother module
>> > >
>> > > Finally got a chance to look at this. There were a typos
>> > > of problems in the README script:
>> > >
>> > > - rpc2cpio -> rpm2cpio
>> > > - remove "patch -p2 < elilo-initrd-size-fix.patch"
>> > >
>> > > The resulting source got a couple of gcc errors
>> > > with find_label having too few arguments. I added
>> > > module_name as the last argument (two places) and
>> > > it compiled.
>> > >
>> > > However, I realize I don't know how to build a RHEL4
>> > > kernel (with Xen mods) and initrd that will successfully
>> > > boot a RHEL4 system (e.g. with LVM in the initrd?)!
>> > > I assume you have done it so far on VTI with an
>> > > unmodified RHEL4 kernel? Unless you can provide a
>> > > recipe for this, I will look into how to do it...
>> > >
>> > > Also, I think Anthony had an update for the Xen hypervisor
>> > > patch (with the complicated arithmetic with constants
>> > > put in a macro)?
>> > >
>> > > Dan
>> > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Yang, Fred [mailto:fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx]
>> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:29 PM
>> > > > To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Xu, Anthony
>> > > > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [elilo-discuss] a patch to
>> > > > make elilo loadanother module
>> > > >
>> > > > Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
>> > > > > Great! I would be happy to try out a preliminary
>> > > > > version of these instructions... Last Friday, I managed
>> > > > > to trash one disk on my test machine and partially trash
>> > > > > another, both running RHEL3.2. Rather than reinstall 3.2
>> > > > > and then install RHEL4 a few days later, I will just
>> > > > > wait and go straight to RHEL4.
>> > > > Attached is a Knowhow to create elilo patch for loading
>> > > > kernel as module, as well as Xen patch for Vti.
>> > > > Please note this patches are only a tempory patches, we will
>> > > > come out yet another patch in a couple days.
>> > > > Current kernel input can only be unzipped image. The next
>> > > > patch will make "module" as the deafult linux kernel and do
>> > > > the corrsponding unzip within elilo. The system.h patch will
>> > > > be surrounded with "#ifdef CONFG_Xen". Xen patch will also
>> > > > include non-VT-I patch code (but without validation due to
>> > > > target linux issue :()
>> > > > -Fred
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home