WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Implementing both (was: Xen/ia64 - global or per VP

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, "Munoz, Alberto J" <alberto.j.munoz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Implementing both (was: Xen/ia64 - global or per VP VHPT)
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:37:44 +0800
Cc: ipf-xen <ipf-xen@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 03 May 2005 04:37:25 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: DIscussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVPb3JXMihcD89IQYupUNJEM3YWVAAEihcQAAFcjdAABKuvsA==
Thread-topic: Implementing both (was: Xen/ia64 - global or per VP VHPT)
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> I _was_ proposing that both mechanisms be present at run time,
> but not necessarily permanently -- just to allow easier
> testing/comparison during development. By the time we have
> real users doing lots of domains, I would hope we would
> have enough data to make a decision.
> 
> Compile-time option would be OK too, but I suspect it
> will lead to a debate about what the distribution-default
> should be :-) or it will keep changing back and forth
> depending on who did the last checkin :-)
> 
> Either way is OK with me.
> 
So you have thought of a way to support foreignmap?
Eddie

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel