WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: introduce HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: introduce HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:57:49 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:59:54 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAE83F6E.341D8%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAE83F6E.341D8%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 15/11/2011 13:53, "Stefano Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Introduce an event channel for buffered io event notifications,
> > advertise the port number using an hvm param.
> > This way the device model is not forced to check the buffered io page
> > for data several times a second for the entire life of the VM (buffered
> > io is mostly used for stdvga emulation in Xen that is switched off after
> > the guest goes into graphical mode).
> 
> It doesn't look like this evtchn can be allocated and specified from outside
> the hypervisor. Hence HVMOP_set_param(BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN) should fail with
> -EINVAL or similar.

Yes, good idea.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>