| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] scheduler rate controller
|
To: |
"Lv, Hui" <hui.lv@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] scheduler rate controller |
|
From: |
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:30:07 +0000 |
|
Cc: |
"Duan, Jiangang" <jiangang.duan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:30:56 -0800 |
|
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cuyTnw2bLqfDsBeha04L5smHFy3be5GBzIj1AyNX43I=; b=crHmEHAPJSP6f7i2/6/AgKRQSj8eEDKpuG7bgYYelKBYDa9/mlzHKosb9Gn7bN8TMV cy+QpPiVn/hQ0axVy2hyL0h+0iZCOiy1MzxYps0KwOxXGAsCWwIuhzyBwmcSeYkAoyql N/KVQjW+/Qf2IVe0PcbHelEyYsYmQZK/hUxSQ= |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F34D480385E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F340768D793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAFLBxZZ9nqeb7CVqTZCsEtJRjgGMTHF2Ak929kvauj2KUFSOyg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F3428CB5EF9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1319789425.19320.12.camel@Abyss> <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F3428CB61F2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1319796584.19320.31.camel@Abyss> <1319818714.21033.414.camel@elijah> <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F34B3905D03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAFLBxZa5v_YgnC1LTa4a5wis4h6eQPijCAfUDLDsR4ucMuBXWg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F34D480385E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Lv, Hui <hui.lv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd like to try this and see the result. May also to compare the results
> between different solutions. As you know, SPECvirt workloads is too complex
> that I need some time to produce this :).
> Also we have a set of small workloads to make quick testing.
BTW, did you take any traces when running SPECVirt for your previous
tests? If you could take some traces of SPECVirt whenever you get to
doing the new tests, that would be really helpful in understanding
both how the SPECVirt benchmark behaves, and how we can best tweak the
scheduler so that it runs better.
Thanks,
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home