On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:03:38AM +0000, Julian Pidancet wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > That wont work reliably - SeaBIOS (and option roms) can grow the EBDA.
> > It's not realistic to put a whole in the middle of the first 640k.
> >
>
> When you say "grow" do you mean grow downwards ? Because if not, the
> ACPI info structure lives in 9F000, so there shouldn't be any problem
> reporting the 0-9F000 range as the memory size in the BDA.
Yes - the EBDA grows down. Both SeaBIOS itself can grow the EBDA (see
pmm.c:zonelow_expand) and option roms can grow the EBDA.
> > As above, this doesn't look right - SeaBIOS will still locate the EBDA
> > at 9fc00 and nothing will stop it from growing it over the 9f000 area.
> >
>
> The EBDA is a standard bios structure, can't we safely assume that
> it's size will hardly change ? If not, would you suggest that this
> ACPI info structure should be placed at a different location ? The
> problem with this is that it has to be in a location with a fixed
> address, and preferably in a location which is accessible by any AML
> interpreter.
Why does it have to be at a fixed location? What structure is
actually placed at this address?
The AML interpreter should be able to see all of ram, so that doesn't
seem like an issue.
-Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home