[Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 9742: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

xen.org writes ("[xen-unstable test] 9742: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 9742 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/9742/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl          18 leak-check/check       fail REGR. vs. 9661
>  test-i386-i386-xl            18 leak-check/check       fail REGR. vs. 9661
>  test-amd64-i386-xl           18 leak-check/check       fail REGR. vs. 9661
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2   18 leak-check/check       fail REGR. vs. 9661
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 18 leak-check/check       fail REGR. vs. 9661

This is the tester complaining that the xenstore path "/libxl" was
leaked.  I have made a version of the tester which doesn't mind that,
adding /libxl to the list of ok-to-be-leaked paths, and this will
hopefully make it through the meta-push-gate soon and thus get us a
push of xen-unstable.

Please ignore any emails from the bisector complaining about this and
fingering the changeset which introduced the /libxl xenstore path.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel