|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] why do I get bad disk write performance in the kernel 3.
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:25 +0000, Roberto Scudeller wrote:
> Ian,
>
>
> That depends on whether Roberto is using xm/xend or xl, I
> think.
> Roberto?
>
> I'm using "xl create windows.cfg"
OK, so you will be getting qdisk (and your logs confirm this).
>
> > You could also try the 'file:/local-disk' which will setup a
> loopback device
> > and use that. Try that as well.
>
>
> This is true with xm/xend but with xl you will need to
> manually setup
> the looback and use phy:/dev/loop in order to perform this
> experiment.
> For xl file: turns into qdisk unless blktap is available.
>
> I'm execute with file:/, but in xenstore-list, continue with qdisk.
Please try using losetup to bind your file to /dev/loopN and specifying
phy:/dev/loopN in your config. That should get you blkback.
[...]
> I try with "file://" and result was qdisk again. Do you think is LVM
> test need?
That would also be interesting.
> Why did kernel 3.1 use the qdisk? I want to use blktap backend
> ('tap2:aio:/disk-local/xvda,xvda,w').
blktap is not available in 3.1. Unfortunately it is not upstreamable so
it is unlikely to become available until someone does a pile of work to
make it a userspace only thing (see the list archives for various
explanations of this).
Since you are using a raw image (rather than e.g. vhd or qcow) there is
no benefit to blktap.
Ian.
>
>
>
> Thanks for help.
>
> --
> Roberto Scudeller
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|