WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: Ping#2: [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cove

To: "Haitao Shan" <maillists.shan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Haitao Shan" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: Ping#2: [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer CPU models
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 08:44:18 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, Donald D Dugger <donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:45:18 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <04F972F38B3C4E4E91C4697DA8BF9F527E41C1F0DD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4EB26BB1020000780005EA78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <04F972F38B3C4E4E91C4697DA8BF9F527E41C1F0DD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 09.11.11 at 03:56, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, Jan,
> 
> I found one useful document in intel website.
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-processor-identification-with 
> -cpuid-model-and-family-numbers/
> From the doc, it seems model 45 is not in the list.

Neither is model 31.

Which tells us what? That the page isn't up-to-date? After all model 31
is referenced in SDM Vol 3 appendix B.4, and model 45 in the same
document appendix B.7. They're also both in table B-1 of the SDM
doc changes (rev 032 from May this year). Or are you saying the SDM
is incorrect?

At least this answers the question raised in
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-11/msg00411.html 
- 0x2E and 0x2F are supposed to go into the Nehalem/Westmere
group then for cpuidle purposes.

Jan

> Shan Haitao
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 5:24 PM
>> To: Haitao Shan; Shan, Haitao
>> Cc: Dugger, Donald D; Nakajima, Jun; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Keir
>> Fraser
>> Subject: Ping#2: [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer
>> CPU models
>> 
>> VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer CPU models #2
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -1738,10 +1738,9 @@ static const struct lbr_info *last_branc
>>          case 23:
>>              return c2_lbr;
>>              break;
>> -        /* Nehalem */
>> -        case 26: case 30: case 31: case 46:
>> -        /* Sandy Bridge */
>> -        case 42: case 45:
>> +        /* Nehalem/Sandy Bridge */
>> +        case 26: case 30: case 31: case 37:
>> +        case 42: case 44: case 45: case 46: case 47:
>>              return nh_lbr;
>>              break;
>>          /* Atom */
>> 
>> 




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel