|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: Ping#2: [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cove
>>> On 09.11.11 at 03:56, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, Jan,
>
> I found one useful document in intel website.
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-processor-identification-with
> -cpuid-model-and-family-numbers/
> From the doc, it seems model 45 is not in the list.
Neither is model 31.
Which tells us what? That the page isn't up-to-date? After all model 31
is referenced in SDM Vol 3 appendix B.4, and model 45 in the same
document appendix B.7. They're also both in table B-1 of the SDM
doc changes (rev 032 from May this year). Or are you saying the SDM
is incorrect?
At least this answers the question raised in
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-11/msg00411.html
- 0x2E and 0x2F are supposed to go into the Nehalem/Westmere
group then for cpuidle purposes.
Jan
> Shan Haitao
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 5:24 PM
>> To: Haitao Shan; Shan, Haitao
>> Cc: Dugger, Donald D; Nakajima, Jun; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Keir
>> Fraser
>> Subject: Ping#2: [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer
>> CPU models
>>
>> VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer CPU models #2
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -1738,10 +1738,9 @@ static const struct lbr_info *last_branc
>> case 23:
>> return c2_lbr;
>> break;
>> - /* Nehalem */
>> - case 26: case 30: case 31: case 46:
>> - /* Sandy Bridge */
>> - case 42: case 45:
>> + /* Nehalem/Sandy Bridge */
>> + case 26: case 30: case 31: case 37:
>> + case 42: case 44: case 45: case 46: case 47:
>> return nh_lbr;
>> break;
>> /* Atom */
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|