|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] TTM DMA pool v2.2 or [GIT PULL] (stable/ttm.dma_
To: |
Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] TTM DMA pool v2.2 or [GIT PULL] (stable/ttm.dma_pool.v2.3) for 3.3 |
From: |
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:41:03 -0400 |
Cc: |
thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx, bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx, airlied@xxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:29:56 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20111104192451.GE2015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<1320173252-2812-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111104183110.GC2015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111104184453.GB1616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111104192451.GE2015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:24:51PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:44:53PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
> > > > stable/ttm.dma_pool.v2.3
> > > >
> > >
> > > On what hw did you tested ? With and without xen ? Here radeon
> >
> > On AMD and Intel. And with both Nvidia and Radeon cards.
> > 64-bit cards (I have a patch where I forced the 64-bit card to use
> > the TTM DMA pool code to test) and 32-bit cards (ATI ES1000)
> >
> > On baremetal and Xen. Um, Fedora Core 16 as distro.
> >
> > Oh, and I also tried PPC (Power Mac 4) but could not get it to boot
> > the 3.1 kernel. Something with the LILO grub loader did not work.
> >
> > > that doesn't need dma32 doesn't work when forcing swiotlb which
> > > kind of expected i guess. Should we expose if swiotlb is enabled
> >
> > You did 'swiotlb=force' ?
> > > forced so we use dma pool in such case ?
>
> Issue is that when booted without force swiotlb_nr_tlb still return
> positive thus we endup using the dma pool path.
Did " Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)" or "software IO TLB at"
show up in the dmesg output? You might have to run it with 'debug loglevel=8'?
Presumarily yes, since the code "swiotlb: Expose.." sets
io_tlb_nslabs = 0
if there is no need for it. And since io_tlb_nslabs is set, then the code
did start.
Some AMD boxes with the AMD-Vi chipset enable the SWIOTLB b/c not all of
the PCI devices are on the IOMMU chipset path. The Intel VT-d does the same
thing.
Hmm, I think the reason for those devices to turn SWIOTLB on is that they
are not comfortable handling 32-bit devices, and the TTM DMA pool code would
only turn itself on when the radeon|nouveau was 32-bit _and_ SWIOTLB was
enabled.
.. Testing the patches you posted on my AMD box.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/11] ttm: Wrap ttm_[put|get]_pages and extract GFP_* and caching states from 'struct ttm_tt', (continued)
|
|
|
|
|