| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 03/13] libxl: Provide a version of bsd's q
On 11/02/11 18:28, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 31 Oct 2011, at 09:43, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 19:37 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
@@ -18,6 +18,14 @@ GPLv2. See the FSF's definition of GPL compatibility:
And how this applies to a range of open source licenses:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
+Additionally, the documentation file tools/libxl/external/bsd-queue.3
+has the 4-clause BSD licence. It is present in the Xen source tree
+for reference purposes for people developing Xen. It is not installed
+by "make install" and is bundled in the source only for convenience of
+distribution. We do not intend that we or Xen users or distributors
+should make any reference to "features or use" of that manpage.
Anil pointed to the OpenBSD version of this page which has that clause
removed. It would simplify things to use their version (of the header
too for consistency)? We are probably not comfortable with just
rescinding the clause ourselves?
If you rescind it yourself, you'll need to go through the FreeBSD CVS history
> to make sure that there were no other contributors other than
Berkeley. OpenBSD
already did that in 2002 (and subsequent patches take on the new license, so it
doesn't matter).
According to cvs history both NetBSD and OpenBSD did that in 2003. Now
it's just about to compare whose content matches most with FreeBSD's
implementation. :)
Christoph
--
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home