Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] libxenstore: Provide xs_che

To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] libxenstore: Provide xs_check_watch
From:	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:35:40 +0000
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:36:13 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1320053998.23193.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<1319827031-15395-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1319827031-15395-2-git-send-email-ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1319827031-15395-3-git-send-email-ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1320053998.23193.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] libxenstore: Provide 
xs_check_watch"):
> Since setnonblock cannot itself return an error should it always
> preserve errno on behalf of the caller?

Good idea.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] libxenstore: Provide xs_check_watch, Ian Jackson <=

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] libxenstore: Provide xs_check_watch