 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] The different between hypercall do_mmu_update and do_update_
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] The different between hypercall do_mmu_update and do_update_va_mapping |
| From: | Steven <wangwangkang@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:31:32 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:32:29 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=E9jHG3VAUVgHAMSVWYmRdN8YMfIeIOQgrxbm2y4x3kE=; b=ebwk/VWOPqlCpG+b8zPxX+Mz7rFij3g7iX+gZAVK+gHkut2kxryZIodFJMLpuDtKBi MMLjpy+WLeRV6nkMy0me9C5fAnMaZ9LV9wyphMHMW+WMbZOfxqjlkmF+E7i0ArVnUnxk c/+1SbBdf8As53bx3ciKaAmC2gzwLZSKmRkxc= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, All
I found that both hypercall do_mmu_update and do_update_va_mapping
performs page table updates for a guest domain.
Suppose both do the normal page table update, are the input
mmu_update_t req {ptr, val} to do_mmu_update both machine frame
address,
while the va of do_update_va_mapping is guest frame address? Thanks.
-- Hui
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Question on RHEL 6 support, Alok Sinha |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Question on RHEL 6 support, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 9357: regressions - FAIL, xen . org |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer CPU models, Jan Beulich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
